Ten commandments
But the faith today is not, rather what we call "morality" which, kim and aggie despite numerous laws are disappearing. In doing so, it is obvious that the crimes are the very acts that are contrary to good morals.
Not to violence
westík wrote:
What he said Rabbi Hillel is best expressed by a minimum. Complementary maximum is "Do unto others what you wish to do unto you." But if we acted in accordance with it, we would not saints, but we would have not only divine, but nadbožské perfection, because YHWH says, "I kim and aggie am a jealous God," which is a sign of imperfection, and along with his deeds described suggests that no God created man in his own image, but he was a man who created God in his own image. The ancient gods as the gods are, they are mostly cruel. Man changing his God, as appropriate, refer to the texts of the New Covenant. We are not perfect and life is not fair. To do so bearable is good about it at least a little effort. In this weed laws distinguish good from evil, that pig confessed. Besides addressees those laws is not to assess them. They just followed. Prototože are laws. As the Roman maxim "Laws must be respected even if the world should kim and aggie perish."
Well, it looks a bit OT, but IMHO it does with only the Ten Commandments Prutiným even remotely related to: http://www.parlamentnilisty.cz/zpravy/Zazmrdovanost-a-vyjimecne-chytry-Klaus-Pravnik-otevrene-o-justici-a-politice-267549
Matzurko, sometimes you just do not notify, kim and aggie or to remain silent, knowing that the victim will act in false assumption .... for example, that the ice on the pond is too weak. Needless to just say that the ice is thick enough.
1) Somehow there mixes the role of the law to the role of conscience. Conscience commands me to do what I consider to be correct, while the law defines what to do if someone can prove that stole hatch from the canal, or the thief hatch when the theft shot.
2) Vagueness (in some ways related to the previous one). When someone selling ultralight violates your point 1, if he will not submit statistics on ultralight fatalities over the past 10 years? Or violating it only when I know that when knowledge of the statistics would not buy it? Or it may not know for sure, just when I realize that he might have bought? But that, among other things. We're back in the realm of conscience. A law of conscience, not replace, replace it as the law of conscience.
Again, from the other side, Rputi, you know how the world cleared kim and aggie and improved, if they were prohibited by law, all call waiting and warning signs, kim and aggie banners, etc. hatch ?? Natural selection would have remained only the wise and careful ...
Yeah, Matzurko, but dabbled in Kant (philosophy) rights at a time when this used to be quite clear and settled kim and aggie ... Then he got through the phrase "moral law", perhaps to the concepts of conscience and the law seem almost as synonyms.
6 - Cat Man interview very nice, but not with the first answer would probably not materially disagree (http://sumavak.blokuje.cz/jaro#comment-40941); rather I take it as a specific defense (presidential) flag. We must not forget what kind of people are these constitutional judges, and how dubious anyway necessarily the proceedings further skewed PL media.
Well, otherwise, therefore, Rputi me somehow that your Ten Commandments as the complete kim and aggie absence of harm and not to compromise (for example, not to manufacture or purely for his own pleasure, in a block of nitroglycerin, although I believe that the nitration I have perfected it ...).
Diehards, I wondered if he would let himself again (for stylistic reasons) T. Jefferson "beg" by B. Franklin in the formulation of "happiness" instead of the "property" if he saw the world today. I. Kant also had "potentially fair rules" as the universal - always valid for all without exception.
Well, why do not - I would say that the reason is gradual, patient and organized relativization property rights. Owner is entitled to decide on their property only "to some extent", which ends where the non decide that it is in the "social interest" opucovat him in the name of "higher principle nevlastnického". Society as a whole does not nezchudne, only existing wealth divided "equitably" because it "society as a whole pays off." So from the above words by me enough third
Everything is partitioned. Play fair. Do not hit anybody. Home of the stuff where you found them. Clean as consecutive. Do not take anything that is not yours. When you hurt someone, say sorry. Before eating, wash your hands. Flush. Warm cookies and cold milk they'll do well. Live a balanced - and learn a little bit every day and think a bit Draw, and draw and sing and dance and play and work. Every afternoon nap. When you go into the world, watch out for cars, grab someone's hand and stay together kim and aggie with others.
if they so nicely moralizes, kim and aggie I would add an instruction that said Robert Anthony
But the faith today is not, rather what we call "morality" which, kim and aggie despite numerous laws are disappearing. In doing so, it is obvious that the crimes are the very acts that are contrary to good morals.
Not to violence
westík wrote:
What he said Rabbi Hillel is best expressed by a minimum. Complementary maximum is "Do unto others what you wish to do unto you." But if we acted in accordance with it, we would not saints, but we would have not only divine, but nadbožské perfection, because YHWH says, "I kim and aggie am a jealous God," which is a sign of imperfection, and along with his deeds described suggests that no God created man in his own image, but he was a man who created God in his own image. The ancient gods as the gods are, they are mostly cruel. Man changing his God, as appropriate, refer to the texts of the New Covenant. We are not perfect and life is not fair. To do so bearable is good about it at least a little effort. In this weed laws distinguish good from evil, that pig confessed. Besides addressees those laws is not to assess them. They just followed. Prototože are laws. As the Roman maxim "Laws must be respected even if the world should kim and aggie perish."
Well, it looks a bit OT, but IMHO it does with only the Ten Commandments Prutiným even remotely related to: http://www.parlamentnilisty.cz/zpravy/Zazmrdovanost-a-vyjimecne-chytry-Klaus-Pravnik-otevrene-o-justici-a-politice-267549
Matzurko, sometimes you just do not notify, kim and aggie or to remain silent, knowing that the victim will act in false assumption .... for example, that the ice on the pond is too weak. Needless to just say that the ice is thick enough.
1) Somehow there mixes the role of the law to the role of conscience. Conscience commands me to do what I consider to be correct, while the law defines what to do if someone can prove that stole hatch from the canal, or the thief hatch when the theft shot.
2) Vagueness (in some ways related to the previous one). When someone selling ultralight violates your point 1, if he will not submit statistics on ultralight fatalities over the past 10 years? Or violating it only when I know that when knowledge of the statistics would not buy it? Or it may not know for sure, just when I realize that he might have bought? But that, among other things. We're back in the realm of conscience. A law of conscience, not replace, replace it as the law of conscience.
Again, from the other side, Rputi, you know how the world cleared kim and aggie and improved, if they were prohibited by law, all call waiting and warning signs, kim and aggie banners, etc. hatch ?? Natural selection would have remained only the wise and careful ...
Yeah, Matzurko, but dabbled in Kant (philosophy) rights at a time when this used to be quite clear and settled kim and aggie ... Then he got through the phrase "moral law", perhaps to the concepts of conscience and the law seem almost as synonyms.
6 - Cat Man interview very nice, but not with the first answer would probably not materially disagree (http://sumavak.blokuje.cz/jaro#comment-40941); rather I take it as a specific defense (presidential) flag. We must not forget what kind of people are these constitutional judges, and how dubious anyway necessarily the proceedings further skewed PL media.
Well, otherwise, therefore, Rputi me somehow that your Ten Commandments as the complete kim and aggie absence of harm and not to compromise (for example, not to manufacture or purely for his own pleasure, in a block of nitroglycerin, although I believe that the nitration I have perfected it ...).
Diehards, I wondered if he would let himself again (for stylistic reasons) T. Jefferson "beg" by B. Franklin in the formulation of "happiness" instead of the "property" if he saw the world today. I. Kant also had "potentially fair rules" as the universal - always valid for all without exception.
Well, why do not - I would say that the reason is gradual, patient and organized relativization property rights. Owner is entitled to decide on their property only "to some extent", which ends where the non decide that it is in the "social interest" opucovat him in the name of "higher principle nevlastnického". Society as a whole does not nezchudne, only existing wealth divided "equitably" because it "society as a whole pays off." So from the above words by me enough third
Everything is partitioned. Play fair. Do not hit anybody. Home of the stuff where you found them. Clean as consecutive. Do not take anything that is not yours. When you hurt someone, say sorry. Before eating, wash your hands. Flush. Warm cookies and cold milk they'll do well. Live a balanced - and learn a little bit every day and think a bit Draw, and draw and sing and dance and play and work. Every afternoon nap. When you go into the world, watch out for cars, grab someone's hand and stay together kim and aggie with others.
if they so nicely moralizes, kim and aggie I would add an instruction that said Robert Anthony
No comments:
Post a Comment